Nicotine Replacement Therapy Prop 65 Warning Unfounded, FDA Tells Court
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
A California appellate court's ruling that a Prop 65 warning for nicotine replacement therapies is not federally preempted would require product manufacturers to use warning language FDA has determined lacks scientific support, the agency says
You may also be interested in...
NRT Firms’ Deference To “Informal” FDA Letters In Prop 65 Case Improper
NRT firms' reliance on "unpublished, ad hoc" FDA statements to support their contention that a Proposition 65 warning on OTC smoking cessation products conflicts with federal law is improper, according to a brief filed in California Supreme Court April 15
NRT Firms’ Deference To “Informal” FDA Letters In Prop 65 Case Improper
NRT firms' reliance on "unpublished, ad hoc" FDA statements to support their contention that a Proposition 65 warning on OTC smoking cessation products conflicts with federal law is improper, according to a brief filed in California Supreme Court April 15
NRT Firms’ Deference To “Informal” FDA Letters In Prop 65 Case Improper
NRT firms' reliance on "unpublished, ad hoc" FDA statements to support their contention that a Proposition 65 warning on OTC smoking cessation products conflicts with federal law is improper, according to a brief filed in California Supreme Court April 15