The Gap countersuit against Estee Lauder claims "100%" logo "lack[s] secondary meaning".
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
ESTEE LAUDER's USE OF "100%" IS "GENERIC, LACK[S] SECONDARY MEANING," GAP CONTENDS in a counterclaim filed June 11 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The claim responds to Estee Lauder's June 4 trademark infringement lawsuit, which alleges that use of "100%" as part of the name for The Gap beauty products is likely to confuse consumers as to the source or sponsorship of the line ("The Rose Sheet" June 10, In Brief).
You may also be interested in...
With a push from the Organic Consumers Association, the National Organic Standards Board is recommending that the use of nanotechnology be strictly prohibited from products certified under the National Organic Program
Though global market-size estimates differ, analysts at SupplySide West 2010 in Las Vegas agreed that cosmeceuticals remain a promising growth vehicle
Weekly Trademark Review