Gillette injunction against Norelco Reflex Action comparative ads partially granted.
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
NORELCO REFLEX ACTION "LESS IRRITATION" SUPERIORITY CLAIMS CAN CONTINUE WITH DISCLAIMER, Boston federal court Judge Reginald Lindsay ruled Nov. 27 in response to Gillette's request for a preliminary injunction against the Philips Electronics division. The application for injunction was filed in conjunction with an Oct. 9 lawsuit, in which the wet shave manufacturer claimed that Norelco's "disparaging" Reflex Action electric shaver ads directly target Gillette's wet shave products ("The Rose Sheet" Oct. 21, p. 1). Pending a decision on the litigation, Gillette requested a preliminary injunction barring Norelco from running all TV, print and radio ads that feature disparaging comparison statements and negative images of wet shavers.
You may also be interested in...
Gillette's Norelco Survey Made "Significant Error" In Omitting Women - Judge
Gillette consumer perception studies submitted as evidence in the Gillette v. Norelco Reflex Action razor lawsuit were found to have a "significant error in methodology" because, in part, they failed to include women, Boston federal court Judge Reginald Lindsay ruled in his Oct. 6 decision against Gillette.
OCA Applauds Organic Board's Recommendation To USDA: "Outlaw Nanotech"
With a push from the Organic Consumers Association, the National Organic Standards Board is recommending that the use of nanotechnology be strictly prohibited from products certified under the National Organic Program