HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

In Brief: Massachusetts Senate Prop 65 clone

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Massachusetts Senate Prop 65 clone: Public hearing on S 488 tentatively scheduled for March 3. CTFA, which opposes the legislation, is planning to attend the hearing and give testimony. The bill was introduced this year by Sen. Lois Pines (D-District 20) and Rep. Douglas Peterson (R-District 11). S 488, much like California's Prop 65 bill, would require warning labels on all products containing ingredients that may be potentially carcinogenic, toxic or cause reproductive toxicity. The Massachusetts bill also mandates the establishment of a toxic effects warning list that would "at a minimum" include all carcinogens, reproductive toxins, neurotoxins, teratogens, mutagens and "extraordinarily hazardous" substances on the state's Department of Public Health substance list. Massachusetts has introduced similar bills in the past several years...

Massachusetts Senate Prop 65 clone: Public hearing on S 488 tentatively scheduled for March 3. CTFA, which opposes the legislation, is planning to attend the hearing and give testimony. The bill was introduced this year by Sen. Lois Pines (D-District 20) and Rep. Douglas Peterson (R-District 11). S 488, much like California's Prop 65 bill, would require warning labels on all products containing ingredients that may be potentially carcinogenic, toxic or cause reproductive toxicity. The Massachusetts bill also mandates the establishment of a toxic effects warning list that would "at a minimum" include all carcinogens, reproductive toxins, neurotoxins, teratogens, mutagens and "extraordinarily hazardous" substances on the state's Department of Public Health substance list. Massachusetts has introduced similar bills in the past several years....

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS003787

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel