HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

John Paul Mitchell Systems, Redken turning to TV for 1998 advertising push.

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS TO INCREASE TELEVISION EXPOSURE by doubling its Paul Mitchell TV advertising budget for the broadcast period January through April, the salon hair care products company said. The company's 1998 ad spend is estimated to be between $10 mil. and $15 mil. The firm has been running limited TV spots since 1990 but said it decided to improve its ad spend and airwave time to improve brand exposure. If the ads are successful, the company said it will continue to run an increased number of TV spots.

You may also be interested in...



OCA Applauds Organic Board's Recommendation To USDA: "Outlaw Nanotech"

With a push from the Organic Consumers Association, the National Organic Standards Board is recommending that the use of nanotechnology be strictly prohibited from products certified under the National Organic Program

Beauty Claims Inch Closer To Pharma As Cosmeceutical Sector Expands

Though global market-size estimates differ, analysts at SupplySide West 2010 in Las Vegas agreed that cosmeceuticals remain a promising growth vehicle

NAD Sides With Gillette Over Energizer In Case Examining Schick Razor Ad

The National Advertising Division concludes that by claiming the Schick Intuition Plus razor "lathers, shaves and moisturizes in one easy step," Energizer Personal Care is implying a long-term post-shave benefit comparable to that awarded by leave-on moisturizer, which is not supported by the company's evidence

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL055695

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel