California animal testing
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Senator Jack O'Connell (D-Santa Barbara) introduces SB 777 Feb 24 to prohibit manufacturers from using the ocular or skin irritant assays on animals to test cosmetics or household products. The tests are "unnecessary for the testing of cosmetics," and are "therefore cruel to animals," the bill states. SB 777 also encourages the use of alternatives to in vivo tests "whenever possible." Any violation will result in a $2,000 fine. The bill had been introduced in two prior sessions, but was vetoed by Republican governors. With the recent appointment of Democrat Gray Davis to the governor's mansion and increased education about the subject, the bill could have an increased chance of passing this session
You may also be interested in...
California Non-Animal Testing Revised Bill To Be Introduced In February
California legislation to ban cosmetics testing on animals is being reworked to prohibit cosmetics manufacturers and contract testing laboratories from conducting animal tests when a validated alternative is available.
OCA Applauds Organic Board's Recommendation To USDA: "Outlaw Nanotech"
With a push from the Organic Consumers Association, the National Organic Standards Board is recommending that the use of nanotechnology be strictly prohibited from products certified under the National Organic Program