HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

California Non-Animal Testing Revised Bill To Be Introduced In February

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

California legislation to ban cosmetics testing on animals is being reworked to prohibit cosmetics manufacturers and contract testing laboratories from conducting animal tests when a validated alternative is available.

You may also be interested in...



Animal testing

Murine local lymph node assay accepted by FDA, the Environmental Protection Agency, Consumer Product Safety Commission and Occupational Safety & Health Administration as an alternative test method for contact dermatitis, the National Institutes of Health announces Dec. 28. The mouse trials can be conducted using fewer animals in most situations, NIH says. The LLNA test also results in less stress on the mice and can be conducted within a week, compared to three to four weeks for the guinea pig test. LLNA was accepted as a viable alternative to guinea pig tests by the Inter-Agency Coordinating Committee for the Validation of Alternative Methods in early 1999 and sent to the federal agencies for review (1"The Rose Sheet" March 29, 1999, p. 9). The assay is the first to clear the validation process

California Animal Testing Bill Withdrawn Due To Lack Of Votes

A California bill to prohibit the use of animal ocular and skin irritation assays to test cosmetics and household products was pulled by sponsor Sen. Jack O'Connell (D-Santa Barbara) after it became apparent the bill did not have enough votes to pass committee.

California animal testing

Senator Jack O'Connell (D-Santa Barbara) introduces SB 777 Feb 24 to prohibit manufacturers from using the ocular or skin irritant assays on animals to test cosmetics or household products. The tests are "unnecessary for the testing of cosmetics," and are "therefore cruel to animals," the bill states. SB 777 also encourages the use of alternatives to in vivo tests "whenever possible." Any violation will result in a $2,000 fine. The bill had been introduced in two prior sessions, but was vetoed by Republican governors. With the recent appointment of Democrat Gray Davis to the governor's mansion and increased education about the subject, the bill could have an increased chance of passing this session

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS007575

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel