Estee Lauder settles suit
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Pretax charge of $22 mil. or $13.5 mil. after tax will be taken in the fiscal fourth quarter ended June 30, 2003 in connection with the settlement of a class action lawsuit, Lauder states in a Security and Exchange Commission filing July 17. Charge will not have "material adverse effect on the company's financial situation," firm notes. Lauder entered settlement agreement July 16 with consumers of prestige cosmetics who claimed high-end cosmetic manufacturers and department stores were involved in price-fixing. Case has been pending in a California superior court since 1998. Lauder has not admitted any wrongdoing, but states it settled to avoid protracted and costly litigation...
You may also be interested in...
Cosmetics settlement approved
Oakland, Calif. federal court judge gives final approval March 8 to price-fixing class settlement, which provides members of the class $175 mil. in department store cosmetics. Agreement was reached in July 2003 regarding the lawsuit, which alleged manufacturers including Estee Lauder, Chanel, Clarins and L'Oréal and department stores such as Federated, May's and Dillard's conspired to fix the prices of cosmetics between May 29, 1994 and July 16, 2003 (1"The Rose Sheet" July 21, 2003, In Brief)...
Cosmetics settlement
Final approval hearing for class settlement between consumers and upscale cosmetics companies and department stores, originally slated for June 8, has been rescheduled to July 13 by Oakland, Calif. federal court. Agreement, reached in July, offers members of the class $175 mil. in department store cosmetics to settle price-fixing allegations against manufacturers including Estee Lauder, Chanel, and L'Oréal and department stores such as Federated, May's and Dillard's (1"The Rose Sheet" July 21, 2003, In Brief). Court has appointed a Special Master to hear and attempt to resolve objections to the settlement and the request by the plaintiffs' attorneys for payment of fees and litigation expenses prior to the hearing. A preliminary objection was filed by Washington Legal Foundation requesting the settlement notice be reissued to allow consumers time to opt out of or file objections to the settlement. The group also asserted the $24 mil. in attorneys' fees should be reduced (2"The Rose Sheet" May 10, 2004, p. 7)...
Cosmetics price-fixing settlement
Final approval hearing for settlement agreement between consumers of prestige cosmetics and various high-end cosmetic manufacturers and department stores will take place June 8 in Oakland, Cal. federal court, according to Cosmetics Antitrust Litigation Settlement Administrator. Agreement was reached last July and makes available to members of the class $175 mil. in department store cosmetics. Plaintiffs claimed that manufacturers including Estee Lauder, Chanel, Clarins and L'Oréal and department stores such Federated, May's and Dillard's conspired to fix the prices of cosmetics between May 29, 1994 and July 16, 2003 (1"The Rose Sheet" July 21, 2003, In Brief)...