HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

TriStrata/Mary Kay suit

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Wilmington, Del. federal court denied Mary Kay's post-trial motions to set aside jury verdict in alpha hydroxy acid patent infringement case, and entered final judgment, with interest, in TriStrata's favor, NeoStrata division reports April 5. Interest on back royalties will bring total amount of the judgment to about $41.4 mil., firm notes. Mary Kay had sought to set aside a 2005 jury verdict, which found the company infringed three TriStrata patents and required direct-seller to pay $26.4 mil. TriStrata won similar AHA patent infringement cases against Valeant Pharmaceuticals, which also failed to overturn a jury verdict (1"The Rose Sheet" March 10, 2004, In Brief)...
Advertisement

Related Content

Advertisement
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS013858

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel