Mislabeled Nail Polishes Warrant Increased Regulation – California DTSC
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
California’s DTSC takes issue with nail polish brands that erroneously claim to be free of toluene, dibutyl phthalate and formaldehyde, calling its review a “wakeup call for greater transparency.” The PBA’s Nail Manufacturers Council does not dispute or disagree with the testing results, but “strongly objects to the report’s lack of perspective and balance.”
You may also be interested in...
Nail care remains a category of interest for the Department of Toxic Substances Control under California’s Safer Consumer Products regulation, which targets chemicals for alternatives analysis and potential elimination. DTSC could see the new study as strengthening the case for action in this area.
A study led by Harvard public health researchers explores a multipart question: If dibutyl phthalate has been phased out of nail polishes, what plasticizers are replacing the ingredient, are they labeled or otherwise declared, and are they any safer than DBP?
Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty raises liability concerns that could be relevant to cosmetics manufacturers still using “toxic trio” ingredients. The firm’s report is a signal at least that rampant US litigation for alleged false advertising and undeclared ingredient risks has reached the international insurance consciousness.