HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


ICCR Addresses Lead Limit, Endocrine Disruptors At 7th Meeting

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Regulators from the US, Canada, Japan and the EU met in Tokyo July 8-10 for the seventh annual meeting of the International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation. The group agreed to recommend a 10-ppm limit on lead in cosmetic products.

You may also be interested in...

By Valenti Organics’ Fruitless Quest For Lead-Free Pigments: A Case Study

The Environmental Working Group is not letting up in its push for FDA to recognize that no amount of lead in cosmetics is safe for consumers. However, a less tolerant regulatory stance on trace lead levels could be a de facto ban on whole categories of products, as By Valenti Organics discovered in its elusive search for “lead-free” pigments.

FDA’s Holiday Gift To Cosmetics Industry: 10ppm Recommended Lead Cap

FDA affirms in draft guidance that a maximum lead level of 10 parts per million in cosmetic products does not pose a health risk to consumers, establishing a position consistent with the Personal Care Products Council’s recommendation in 2011. The formal stance from FDA could take some heat off of manufacturers, though the Environmental Working Group says it will continue pushing for tighter restrictions.

ICCR Report On Trace 1,4-Dioxane Undergoing EU Committee Review

A report developed by an International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation working group on trace 1,4-dioxane in cosmetic products will be the subject of an opinion expected from the EU's Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety in March. If it sticks with its informal position offered on the report in 2013, SCCS may reject a proposed 25 ppm interim maximum on the substance, recommending that a 10 ppm limit be imposed.

Related Content




Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts