NAD Draws Line Between Puffery, Substantive Claims In Pink Armor Case
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Ontel should discontinue its use of “before” and “after” images in Pink Armor Nail Gel advertising, as the dramatic results depicted need to be supported with reliable scientific evidence, the National Advertising Division says. The industry self-regulatory body agrees with challenger Coty that Ontel’s claims are not mere puffery and that consumer accounts of their experiences with the product are not adequate substantiation.
You may also be interested in...
The European Commission issued requests on 4 February for updated opinions from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety on octocrylene, homosalate and benzophenone-3, in light of concerns that led to their listing in 2019 as “higher priority” substances used in cosmetics with endocrine-disrupting potential.
Headed for its second reading in the Florida House after its counterpart passed the Senate on 29 January, HB 113 would expressly preempt local regulation of OTC drugs and cosmetics. According to House analysis documents, “This nullifies the current City of Key West ordinance” banning the sale of sunscreens containing reputed coral-killing UV filters.
As of 5 February, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety is evaluating use of titanium dioxide – now officially classified as a Category 2 carcinogen in the EU – in cosmetic products that can expose consumers by way of inhalation. Without a favorable SCCS opinion, the ingredient’s use in those contexts will be banned under Article 15 of the Cosmetics Regulation.