Suppliers Ready Microbead Alternatives, Touting Value Despite Expense
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Personal-care product manufacturers are under pressure to reformulate items containing plastic microbeads as states take steps to legislate the ingredients away due to environmental concerns, and ingredient suppliers are increasing efforts to promote their alternative offerings. Providers emphasize alternatives’ built-in value, which offsets the premium pricing of many such offerings.
You may also be interested in...
A House bill introduced June 18 would ban the sale of personal-care products containing synthetic plastic microbeads by 2018; J&J’s RoC brand releases study identifying the U.S.’s most “wrinkle-prone” cities; Pantene urges women to reserve their apologies. More news in brief.
Following bills introduced in February by New York and California that would ban plastic microbeads from personal-care products because of suspected environmental effects, Ohio, Illinois, Minnesota and N.J. follow suit. Triclosan also earns the attention of policymakers, with bans proposed in two more states.
Covington & Burling attorney Peter Barton Hutt brings historical perspective to the matter of cosmetics reform legislation in US Congress, which stalled out in 2020 after COVID hit the states. He advises companies to continue working to meet and exceed existing regulatory requirements "so that people can’t say that voluntary self-regulation doesn’t work."