Are Beauty Ads Held To Unique Standards? NARB Ruling Spurs Debate
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
At the National Advertising Division’s Annual Conference, NAD staffers, FTC officials and attorneys discussed whether beauty ads are regulated differently from advertising in other industries. L’Oreal’s successful appeal of a recent NAD decision regarding the use of lash inserts in Maybelline mascara ads could set a new and questionable precedent, according to NAD Director Andrea Levine.
You may also be interested in...
L’Oreal Win In UK Ad Forum May Be Best Promotion For Maybelline Mascara
The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority accepts that L’Oreal’s Maybelline Total Temptation Mascara really does award the lashes seen in advertising without pre- or post-production enhancements. A complainant challenged a commercial for the product, convinced that the mascara’s effects were deceptively exaggerated.
ASA Ruling Signals UK May Be Less Tolerant Of Lash Inserts In Mascara Ads
Use of lash inserts in mascara ads has been a subject of contention in the US, but a 2014 verdict from the National Advertising Review Board essentially green-lighted their continued use with proper disclaimers. The same leeway may not be available in the UK, based on an April 19 ruling from the Advertising Standards Authority.
Philosophy To Defend Time in a Bottle Claims With NARB Appeal
NAD recommends discontinuation of numerous claims, many on product packaging, for the Coty brand’s Time in a Bottle Age-Defying Serum, citing flaws in the advertiser’s six-month, blinded clinical study. Philosophy will appeal to the National Advertising Review Board, arguing that “left uncorrected, the NAD’s decision would … disincentivize manufacturers from conducting similar comprehensive studies.”