HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Cruelty Free Int’l Looks To Next Congress For Cosmetic Animal-Testing Bill

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

NGO Cruelty Free International is optimistic that the Humane Cosmetics Act, which would ban the sale of cosmetics tested on animals and cosmetics containing animal-tested ingredients, will be re-introduced in the next Congress. The bill sponsor’s expected successor in the House, Democrat Don Beyer, cites “prohibiting animal testing in the cosmetics industry” among issues he aspires to promote.

You may also be interested in...

Cosmetic Animal Testing In Brief

New legislation in Korea is expected to ban cosmetic animal testing beginning in 2017; As more countries around the world move toward similar bans, animal-welfare groups are setting their sights on the U.S. Meanwhile, PETA claims the European Chemicals Agency has shown “shocking ambivalence and reluctance” to adapt its REACH dossier evaluation approach to ensure animal tests are being conducted only as a “last resort.”

In Brief

The Sunscreen Innovation Act passes with President Obama’s autograph; movement to ban cosmetic animal-testing in Australia gains momentum. More news in brief.

ECHA Clarifies Exceptions To Cosmetic Animal-Test Ban; NGOs Regroup

The European Coalition to End Animal Experiments protests that “in practice, the animal tests bans would have virtually no application,” following ECHA’s clarification of REACH-related exceptions to Europe’s prohibition on animal testing for cosmetic ingredients. According to ECHA, the ban does not apply to testing required under REACH for “environmental endpoints, exposure of workers and non-cosmetic uses of substances.”

Related Content




Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts