CSC: Feinstein Bill Needs Stronger Safety Standard, Fragrance Disclosure
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Campaign for Safe Cosmetics co-founder Janet Nudelman characterizes the proposed Personal Care Products Safety Act as “a really good bill with a few fatal flaws.” The legislation’s ingredient safety standards are “weak,” there remains a need for mandatory fragrance disclosure and in light of the bill’s perceived shortcomings, CSC is leery of its federal-preemption component, she told “The Rose Sheet.”
You may also be interested in...
The Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act would establish a reasonable-certainty-of-no-harm standard for FDA’s review of ingredients and require companies to share their safety information for every product with the agency, which in turn would publish it for public consumption. The bill is highly similar to Schakowsky’s previous reform proposals that divided industry and the NGO community.
Nearly 80% of the “toxins” detected in the Breast Cancer Prevention Partners’ cosmetics analysis were fragrance chemicals undeclared (lawfully) on product labeling, according to the NGO, which seeks regulatory changes to mandate full ingredient disclosure. Industry is calling the report misinformation, but it’s garnering media attention and being cited by the sponsor of a new cosmetic reform bill in the House.
With WEN safety issues still weighing on his mind, Congressman Frank Pallone aims to unveil his planned cosmetics legislation in September and push for a public hearing. Safe-cosmetics champion Stacy Malkan and New York Times reporter Eric Lipton joined Pallone August 17 for an NPR panel on “The Battle to Regulate Cosmetics.”