NARB Panel Finds Philosophy's Study Reliable For Time In A Bottle Claims
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
The National Advertising Review Board's ruling on Coty/Philosophy's claims promoting the Time in a Bottle serum is considerably more favorable than the National Advertising Division's initial decision last year. Notably, the appellate body finds the advertiser's key clinical study reliable to support modified versions of statements NAD said should be discontinued, including a "two years younger" anti-aging claim.
You may also be interested in...
Philosophy To Defend Time in a Bottle Claims With NARB Appeal
NAD recommends discontinuation of numerous claims, many on product packaging, for the Coty brand’s Time in a Bottle Age-Defying Serum, citing flaws in the advertiser’s six-month, blinded clinical study. Philosophy will appeal to the National Advertising Review Board, arguing that “left uncorrected, the NAD’s decision would … disincentivize manufacturers from conducting similar comprehensive studies.”
Unilever’s Dove Recommits To ‘Real Women’ Against Rising AI Threat
Unilever PLC’s Dove and Baby Dove brands continue tackling prominent social causes with a vow to be responsible about representing women realistically in advertising in the age of AI and a renewed commitment to closing the Black maternal care gap.
L’Oreal Joins J&J And Major Retailers Defending Benzene Class Actions In Federal Courts
Benzoyl peroxide-based acne drug products and their alleged proclivity to become contaminated with carcinogenic benzene are at the center of putative class actions filing against L’Oreal in federal courts around the US.