California's Nonconforming Microbeads Bill Could Limit Viable Alternatives
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
While industry has lobbied for uniformity in state legislation phasing out plastic microbeads in personal-care products, a bill is gaining steam in California that could bar manufacturers from adopting even biodegradable plastic alternatives due to a broader definition of targeted ingredients. Meanwhile, a House microbeads bill at the federal level has gained a companion in the Senate, but definitions are still unclear.
You may also be interested in...
The Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 was approved via voice vote by the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee May14; Avon says it has not received a buyout offer from PTG Capital Partners despite a May 13 SEC filing from the firm indicating as much. More news in brief.
Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., reintroduces his bill proposing a ban on personal-care products containing synthetic plastic microbeads; Oregon legislation would require ingredient reporting and reformulations from manufacturers of children’s cosmetics containing flagged chemicals. More regulatory news.
Manufacturers of hair finishing sprays, no-rinse shampoos and personal fragrance products – eg, perfumes, colognes and body sprays – face significant reformulation challenges under a draft proposal from California’s Air Resources Board that contemplates fewer category impacts, but deeper VOC cuts, compared with previous considerations to help meet state-wide pollution-reduction goals.