Bipartisan Support Could Propel U.S. Bill To Ban Cosmetic Animal Testing
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
A bipartisan bill introduced in the House would ban animal testing of cosmetics and cosmetic ingredients in the U.S. one year after the bill becomes law, and the sale of cosmetic products tested on animals within three years after enactment. Animal-rights groups applauded the measure.
You may also be interested in...
While the previous session’s iteration of the Humane Cosmetics Act attracted support from nearly 40% of the House, it did not advance – a fate sponsors hope to avoid with broad bipartisan support and assurances that the bill would not hurt businesses.
The European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients awaits a ruling from the European Court of Justice – expected in about two years – as to whether the ban in the EU necessarily prohibits the marketing of cosmetic ingredients tested on animals to meet regulatory requirements in third countries. Animal-welfare groups claim EFfCI’s aim is to “severely weaken” the ban and “herald a return to the dark days of animals suffering.”
Manufacturers of hair finishing sprays, no-rinse shampoos and personal fragrance products – eg, perfumes, colognes and body sprays – face significant reformulation challenges under a draft proposal from California’s Air Resources Board that contemplates fewer category impacts, but deeper VOC cuts, compared with previous considerations to help meet state-wide pollution-reduction goals.