CIR Experts Grapple With Computer-Based Ingredient Safety Predictions
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
At the December meeting of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel, panelists expressed reservations about relying on data from predictive in silico models in assessing the safety of PEGs cocamine. Panel members appreciated the usefulness of computational modeling and analyses, but the extent to which they can be relied upon – and how and when they should be used to inform a safety decision within the CIR context – are questions that warrant further discussion, they suggested.
You may also be interested in...
At its December meeting in Washington, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel finalized safety assessments for eight ingredients and advanced three other reports. In its reviews, the group made selective use of read-across data while agreeing to discuss protocol for employing the predictive approach in future reviews.
Cosmetics Industry Awaits ‘Critical’ Safety Assessment Clarification Under China’s New Framework Reg
The China State Council’s January approval of an overarching Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation promises to bring about long-awaited reforms. But draft regulations targeted for release in coming months will be key to the implementation of CSAR provisions, the Personal Care Products Council says.
As European industry’s concerns grow about “politicization” of regulatory programs, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement’s cosmetics annex directs regulatory authorities pursuing new rules to give due consideration to scientific and technical guidance documents developed through international collaboration.