HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Dismissal Of TiO2 Prop 65 Case Offers Lessons, Renewed Hope For Industry

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

A legal win for industry in California Prop 65 litigation targeting titanium dioxide-containing cosmetics illustrates the importance of getting involved early in the listing process and challenging the factual basis for exposure claims. Morrison & Foerster attorney Michael Steel discusses the case and its takeaways.

You may also be interested in...



California Safe Cosmetics Funding Push Fails At Eleventh Hour

Industry no doubt is less disappointed by the state’s 2018-2019 budget, approved by lawmakers June 14, than the NGOs that pushed for additional resources to strengthen California’s Safe Cosmetics Program. The funding proposal was approved by Senate and Assembly committees but ultimately got the ax.

2015 in Review: 'Natural' Claims, Prop 65 Proposals Pose Legal Risks

"Natural" claims on cosmetic products continued to be a fiercely contested issue in federal courts in 2015, with further developments expected in the new year that will help to clarify marketers' legal responsibilities. Meanwhile, proposed updates to California's Prop 65 chemicals list and warning requirements raised concerns about increased litigation under the controversial program.

OEHHA Prop 65 Website Proposal Is Mixed Bag For Industry

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has proposed creation of a website to provide consumers with information on products containing ingredients subject to Proposition 65 reporting. The regulatory proposal would require firms to provide, at OEHHA’s request, data for the website regarding ingredient concentrations, exposure pathways and/or estimated exposure levels.

Related Content

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS019626

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel