HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Honest Company Sued For Duplicitous Natural, Sunscreen-Efficacy Claims

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

A consumer suit filed in California district court builds on recent Honest sunscreen controversy and growing criticism aimed at the "non-toxic" family brand, calling the company out for use of synthetic chemicals in its purported natural offerings, as well as efficacy claims for its sunscreen that failed to protect users. The plaintiff seeks class certification and damages of at least $5 million, as well as a "corrective" ad campaign.

You may also be interested in...



Honest's $7.35M Settlement Of 'Natural' Suit Will Include Claims Revisions

The Jessica Alba-fronted company's use of "SLS-free" and "all natural" claims on personal-care and household products will cost the firm around $9m in total under proposed settlements in California and New York district courts. Honest also will relabel products as part of the $7.35m deal reached in the Empire State.

Honest Company Heads For $1.55M Settlement In 'SLS-Free' Dispute

Honest may be close to putting its legal woes behind it and chalking them up to growing pains, with proposed settlements notified in California and New York district courts. Plaintiffs have accused the firm of misleading consumers with deceptive "SLS-free," "natural" and other claims.

Babyganics Class Action Explores Issues Central To Organic Deception

Plaintiffs claim the SC Johnson brand’s marketing statements and name are clear attempts to capitalize on consumer demand for organic, but its product formulations fall short of organic standards and “reasonable consumer” expectations. Filed in New York’s Southern District, the proposed class action gets at the heart of issues recently discussed in an FTC/USDA roundtable.

Related Content

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS019645

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel