'Free Of' Marketing: Honestly, Why Bother?
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Editorial: The WSJ reports that independent lab testing detected sodium lauryl sulfate in The Honest Company's liquid dish detergent, contrary to the startup's "free of" claims. Honest disputes the finding, but the resulting media storm and PR implications underscore the challenges inherent in such positioning, the scrutiny it invites and the risks a company assumes in marketing products for what they are not.
You may also be interested in...
"Paraben-free" claims should not be allowed on cosmetic products because they denigrate the entire ingredient group, including safe options authorized for EU use, a European Commission working group asserts in recently published guidance. It remains to be seen if and how national regulatory authorities implement the guidance and how brands react that have made such claims a core component of their ethos.
Honest may be close to putting its legal woes behind it and chalking them up to growing pains, with proposed settlements notified in California and New York district courts. Plaintiffs have accused the firm of misleading consumers with deceptive "SLS-free," "natural" and other claims.
Undeclared ingredient use by Ava Anderson Non Toxic and the presence of sodium lauryl sulfate in Honest Company products, contrary to its “free of” claims, led to the former’s collapse and class action litigation against the latter in 2016. Meanwhile, “natural” marketing continues to be a risky business, with FTC stepping up enforcement action last year and efforts underway to promote clearer legal standards.