HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA: EOS Lip Balms Linked To Adverse Reactions, But Cause Is Unknown

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

In a March 16 post to its website, FDA says that after inspecting EOS Products' contract manufacturer, it still cannot determine why consumers are experiencing rashes, blisters and cracked lips following use of EOS Lip Balm.

You may also be interested in...



FDA Divulges Cosmetics Enforcement Data, Notes Hair Loss As ‘Serious’ AE

Momentum this year behind legislative proposals for cosmetics regulatory reform has prompted key Congress members to question FDA about the current oversight system. In a response to the Senate HELP Committee’s chairman, FDA provides a wealth of data on its enforcement activities and confirms hair loss as an adverse event it considers “serious,” if not one currently identified as such by MedWatch’s definition.

PCPC: Cosmetic Legislation A Long Shot In 2016, But Objectives Are Clear

The Personal Care Products Council isn't counting on the Personal Care Products Safety Act to pass in 2016, but compromise efforts to reconcile that bill and the Cosmetic Modernization Amendments supported by small business could be the ticket to reform in the 115th Congress, the trade group suggests. PCPC execs discussed the current legislative landscape at the group's annual meeting in Palm Beach, Florida.

Complaints Allege Guthy-Renker’s WEN Conditioner Line Causes Hair Loss

A suit filed March 17 alleges the products cause extreme and possibly permanent damage to hair, including hair loss, visible bald spots and severe breakage. In an earlier suit, the firm argued that a mandatory agreement requires customers to submit claims to binding individual arbitration rather than proceeding in court.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS019837

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel