HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Cruelty Free Optimistic About Legal Opinion On EU's Marketing Ban

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Cosmetics launching to the EU market must be substantiated for safety, and that assessment could not rely on new animal tests conducted to comply with REACH or Chinese regulations or for any other reason if a European court takes its lead advisor's recommendation. Cruelty Free International would see that as a win, even if the marketing ban for animal-tested ingredients ends up being something less than initially thought.

You may also be interested in...



Questions Remain On Animal Testing Ban, Possible Loopholes

While it appears inevitable that the European Commission’s full ban on testing cosmetic ingredients on animals will proceed starting March 11 as dictated by the Cosmetics Directive, how the EC and member states will interpret and enforce the ban remains to be seen. Consulting firm Technology Sciences Group believes the regulation may be more flexible, and less onerous, than anticipated.

‘Astonishing Results’ Or ‘Outrageous’ Claims? Peter Thomas Roth Fighting Bicoastal Class Actions

Plaintiffs against the prestige, “clinical” skin-care company are targeting anti-aging claims on its Rose Stem Cell Bio-Repair line and statements about hyaluronic acid’s ultra-moisturizing capabilities, used to market its Water Drench range. PTR faces false advertising class actions in California and New York federal courts, and the former case appears to be headed for trial.

Purell Battling Class Actions Over Disease Claims While World Scrambles To Increase Hand Sanitizer Supplies

Leading chemical firms, beauty and consumer health companies, even distilleries and medical marijuana cultivators are adapting operations to meet global demand for hand sanitizers amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, plaintiff’s attorneys are busy with multiple class actions against Purell manufacturer GOJO Industries for alleged false advertising following a January warning letter to the firm from the US FDA.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS019846

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel