Class-Action Clock May Be Ticking For Ava Anderson Non Toxic
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
While maintaining that a former supplier is at fault, "natural" pet-food maker Blue Buffalo announced in December a $32m settlement over allegations that ingredients found in its products directly conflict with its "True Blue" labeling and promotional message. The firm's plight could bode ill for Ava Anderson Non Toxic, which has admitted to controversial ingredient-labeling omissions that it attributes to supplier violations.
You may also be interested in...
Honest Company Sued For Duplicitous Natural, Sunscreen-Efficacy Claims
A consumer suit filed in California district court builds on recent Honest sunscreen controversy and growing criticism aimed at the "non-toxic" family brand, calling the company out for use of synthetic chemicals in its purported natural offerings, as well as efficacy claims for its sunscreen that failed to protect users. The plaintiff seeks class certification and damages of at least $5 million, as well as a "corrective" ad campaign.
Unilever’s Dove Recommits To ‘Real Women’ Against Rising AI Threat
Unilever PLC’s Dove and Baby Dove brands continue tackling prominent social causes with a vow to be responsible about representing women realistically in advertising in the age of AI and a renewed commitment to closing the Black maternal care gap.
L’Oreal Joins J&J And Major Retailers Defending Benzene Class Actions In Federal Courts
Benzoyl peroxide-based acne drug products and their alleged proclivity to become contaminated with carcinogenic benzene are at the center of putative class actions filing against L’Oreal in federal courts around the US.