HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


In Brief: NGO Finds 'High Risk' Baby Cosmetics; California Cleaning Bill Fails; More

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

A survey of the French market finding a high percentage of alleged "high risk" ingredients in baby cosmetics is cause for tighter regulations, Women in Europe for a Common Future says. In other news, the failure of a California bill in the state Assembly is a victory for the fragrance industry, and L'Oreal proposes a Google exec for its board.

You may also be interested in...

California Cleaning Products Bill Could Portend Broader Fragrance Disclosure

The California Assembly vote in the coming weeks on a bill that would mandate ingredient disclosure for household cleaning products – including fragrance components – a move that could help pave the way for fragrance disclosure in the personal-care industry and other sectors. AB 708 is backed by NGOs including the Environmental Working Group and the Breast Cancer Fund.

European Scientific Committee Not Budging On Recommended MI Restrictions

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety is not swayed by Cosmetic Europe's updated data submission suggesting that methylisothiazolinone can be safely used to preserve cosmetic products in concentrations as high as 100 ppm, taking issue with industry's Quantitative Risk Assessment model for dermal sensitization and tests cited in the trade group's calculations. The committee stands by its position that MI is unsafe for use in leave-on cosmetics and should be restricted to 15 ppm in rinse-off products.

California Federal Court Rejects Settlement Proposal In Coppertone ‘Mineral-Based’ Sunscreen Case

Beiersdorf and former owner Bayer are on the verge of settling a proposed class action in California’s Northern District challenging “mineral-based” claims on Coppertone sunscreens that also contain chemical UV filters. However, the parties will have to try again with their proposed terms.





Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts