HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Mary Kay Maintains PCPSA ‘Falls Short’ On Preemption Grounds

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

The Rose Sheet offers a comparative analysis of federal preemption provisions in the Personal Care Products Safety Act and Cosmetic Modernization Amendments of 2015, proposed in the US Senate and House, respectively. Mary Kay isn’t budging in its position that the former provides insufficient assurance of national uniformity.

You may also be interested in...



House Cosmetic Bills Conflict On Preemption, Cast PCPSA As Compromise

Tucker Ellis attorney Ronie Schmelz discusses preemption language in the discussion draft from New Jersey congressmen Frank Pallone and Leonard Lance, which actually just confirms that state regulations could continue unchecked. The proposal could identify the Personal Care Products Safety Act in the Senate as the compromise between no preemption and the blanket preemption clause in another House draft bill.

Senate HELP To Hear From Stakeholders In Changed Cosmetics Industry

Since 2012 when a House committee held the last cosmetics hearing, industry generally has warmed to – or resigned itself to – legislative proposals to update the cosmetics regulatory system. However, there is still not consensus on the details among big business, SMEs and consumer advocates, all of which will be represented at the Senate HELP Committee’s witness table.

Pallone/Lance Cosmetics Proposal Leaves Preemption Blanks To Be Filled

The New Jersey congressmen are still working on language regarding a key challenge facing cosmetics legislation. There is still no consensus among stakeholders on whether and to what extent states should be barred from imposing regulations on cosmetic companies that differ from or add to federal requirements.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS108479

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel