NPA Says Its ‘Natural’ Reg Proposal Jibes With FTC View, Court Trends
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Natural trade association says a multi-tiered regulatory framework differentiating between “All Natural” and “Natural” claims, as well as other lower-level natural assertions, would require substantiation from brands on par with that currently sought by the courts while helping to keep companies out of them.
You may also be interested in...
California Baby CEO Jessica Iclisoy discusses the newly founded Natural Advisory Council. The organization aims to provide a platform for stakeholder data sharing and discussion of “natural” priorities while educating consumers and pushing for legislation to define “natural” and establish requirements for the term’s use.
The USDA’s National Organic Program, which sets requirements for “100% Organic,” “Organic” and “Made with Organic” products, should be the model on which natural regulation is based at FDA, according to the Natural Products Association, which has administered its own natural personal-care standard and certification program for almost a decade. Legislation likely would be needed, and the FDA burden would be considerable.
The Federal Trade Commission announces unanimous approval of final consent orders requiring four personal-care companies to make only properly substantiated “all-natural” and “100% natural” product claims from this point forward. In response to a submitted comment, FTC offers perspective on plain “natural” claims based on its understanding of how consumers interpret the term.