HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

WEN Will Guthy-Renker, Chaz Dean Put Hair-Loss Ordeal Behind Them?

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

WEN is “new” spelled backwards, but the safety scrutiny facing the hair-care brand is anything but. FDA continues to investigate related adverse-event reports, but 2017 could be the year that Guthy-Renker and Chaz Dean dispense with the lion’s share of consumer complaints and associated payouts.

You may also be interested in...



Monat Offensive Fails To Deter Class Actions For Alleged Fraud, Hair Loss

Direct seller launched a preemptive strike last year against a professional stylist for her allegations that Monat hair products cause hair loss and other damage "just like WEN." In recent weeks, the firm has lodged more defamation suits against individuals, while plaintiffs have begun filing proposed class actions against Monat in Florida federal court

Monat Sues Former Sales Rep For 'Libelous' WEN-Like Allegations

The hair-care direct seller seeks injunctive relief and damages in a suit against a former sales rep who allegedly started the "Monat – My Modern Nightmare" Facebook group. According to Monat, there's no scientific or factual basis for defendant's claims that its products cause balding, hair loss and scalp damage.

Natural Hints, ‘Free Of’ Claims Risky For Hair Relaxers; Ask L’Oreal

L’Oreal failed in March to dismiss the majority of plaintiff claims in a putative class action alleging that the Soft-Sheen Carson Amla Legend hair relaxer is deceptively labeled and marketed, putting consumers at risk. According to plaintiffs’ latest amended complaint, the brand’s amla oil and “no lye” claims prepare users for a relatively gentle hair-smoothing experience, which has not been the case for many.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS108712

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel