UK Says no!no! To Hair-Removal Device Long-Term Benefit Claims
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
The UK's independent ad regulator suggests the popular no!no! PRO device's clinically demonstrated efficacy may be limited to hair removal at the time of treatment rather than longer-term benefits, making its utility roughly on par with shaving and other traditional methods.
You may also be interested in...
Does Rival Hair Remover Compete With Tria Results? Tria Says no!no!
Two studies evaluating the effectiveness of competing hair-removal devices elucidate the long-term value of one system — the Tria Hair Removal Laser — while finding that Photomedex’s no!no! device offers results roughly equivalent to traditional shaving.
Unilever’s Dove Recommits To ‘Real Women’ Against Rising AI Threat
Unilever PLC’s Dove and Baby Dove brands continue tackling prominent social causes with a vow to be responsible about representing women realistically in advertising in the age of AI and a renewed commitment to closing the Black maternal care gap.
L’Oreal Joins J&J And Major Retailers Defending Benzene Class Actions In Federal Courts
Benzoyl peroxide-based acne drug products and their alleged proclivity to become contaminated with carcinogenic benzene are at the center of putative class actions filing against L’Oreal in federal courts around the US.