J&J Agrees To $6.75M Aveeno Active Naturals Class Settlement
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
The firm failed in motions to dismiss plaintiff claims and block class certification in a suit alleging that Aveeno Active Naturals products are falsely advertised because they contain synthetic ingredients. Meanwhile, class certification was granted recently in a separate case concerning Aveeno Baby "natural" claims, which could portend another settlement to come.
You may also be interested in...
Are ‘Natural’ Claims Equivalent To ‘All Natural’? Tarte’s $1.7m Settlement Offers Little Instruction
Tarte admits no wrongdoing in its settlement with nationwide purchasers of its “high performance naturals,” and it put up little fight in order to minimize costs. Insight remains limited as to whether federal courts agree with plaintiffs that general “natural” claims on cosmetic products – as opposed to “all natural” or “100% natural” assertions – mean no synthetic ingredients at all.
Fushi Wellbeing – which markets a range of organic, fresh-pressed face oils derived from the cherry seed, baobab seed and argan nut, among other natural sources – challenged Clinique’s Fresh Pressed line name in light of the brand’s heavy reliance on chemically derived ingredients.
Industry is viewed as a source of revenues by underfunded states and counties, says American Herbal Products Association general counsel Anthony Young. Companies that sell large amounts of products in California, New York and New Jersey or that sell mostly through their own website also are big targets for class action lawsuits as well as government agency complaints.