HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Labdoor Closes Door To Jarrow's Challenge In A NAD Review

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Labdoor, which offers online sales of products in addition to publishing rankings within product categories based on its evaluations, declined to offer evidence for NAD's review of challenges by Jarrow Formulas.

You may also be interested in...



Gingko Supplement Adulteration Points To Broader Problem For FDA – CSPI

Nutrition and food safety watchdog group asks FDA to enforce against marketers of ginkgo supplements after ConsumerLab.com found that six of 10 ginkgo supplements it tested contained either less of the herb than advertised or different and cheaper plant material.

Industry Roundup: DXM Bill Moves, CHPA Biz Dev VP, Neurobrands Injunction

House subcommittee approves DXM Abuse bill; UK ire for US firm’s patch claims; Innophos VP hire; and more news in brief.

ConsumerLab drops CRN suit

ConsumerLab.com has voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit that it brought against the Council for Responsible Nutrition in 2005, which made claims such as injurious falsehoods, trade libel and unfair trade practices, CRN announces Nov. 17. ConsumerLab filed the suit after FTC declined a January 2005 request by CRN to investigate the business practices of the company, which tests supplements for potency and contaminants. In May, a New York Supreme Court judge dismissed eight of ConsumerLab's nine counts, allowing the case to proceed only on the charge of defamation (1"The Tan Sheet" May 29, 2006, p. 9). According to CRN, ConsumerLab dropped the lawsuit "as CRN was about to ask the Court to require ConsumerLab.com to produce additional information and documents about its business practices." In a same-day release, ConsumerLab responded that it dropped the suit because "CRN's legal tactics forced [us] to divert an extraordinary amount of resources to the case"...

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

GB150348

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel