Labdoor Closes Door To Jarrow's Challenge In A NAD Review
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Labdoor, which offers online sales of products in addition to publishing rankings within product categories based on its evaluations, declined to offer evidence for NAD's review of challenges by Jarrow Formulas.
You may also be interested in...
Gingko Supplement Adulteration Points To Broader Problem For FDA – CSPI
Nutrition and food safety watchdog group asks FDA to enforce against marketers of ginkgo supplements after ConsumerLab.com found that six of 10 ginkgo supplements it tested contained either less of the herb than advertised or different and cheaper plant material.
Industry Roundup: DXM Bill Moves, CHPA Biz Dev VP, Neurobrands Injunction
House subcommittee approves DXM Abuse bill; UK ire for US firm’s patch claims; Innophos VP hire; and more news in brief.
ConsumerLab drops CRN suit
ConsumerLab.com has voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit that it brought against the Council for Responsible Nutrition in 2005, which made claims such as injurious falsehoods, trade libel and unfair trade practices, CRN announces Nov. 17. ConsumerLab filed the suit after FTC declined a January 2005 request by CRN to investigate the business practices of the company, which tests supplements for potency and contaminants. In May, a New York Supreme Court judge dismissed eight of ConsumerLab's nine counts, allowing the case to proceed only on the charge of defamation (1"The Tan Sheet" May 29, 2006, p. 9). According to CRN, ConsumerLab dropped the lawsuit "as CRN was about to ask the Court to require ConsumerLab.com to produce additional information and documents about its business practices." In a same-day release, ConsumerLab responded that it dropped the suit because "CRN's legal tactics forced [us] to divert an extraordinary amount of resources to the case"...