Just For Men's Hair-Dye Marketing Amounts To Civil Rights Violation – Plaintiff
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
The latest class action targeting Just For Men owner Combe is a variation on a theme prevalent in other suits across the country, alleging that the company has failed to warn consumers adequately about p-phenylenediamine risks. This one goes further, asserting violations of federal equal rights law.
You may also be interested in...
Current and former owners Coty and P&G knew or should have known about product hazards associated with Clairol Balsam Color hair-dye kits that are not adequately communicated to consumers, including the sensitizing potential of p-phenylenediamine, according to a putative class action filed in Alabama district court.
Putative class actions against L’Oreal alleging that a Soft Sheen-Carson hair relaxer causes hair loss and scalp irritation have been consolidated in New York’s Southern District. Similar to complaints targeting WEN in recent years, the L’Oreal suits cite “an inherent design and/or manufacturing defect,” but L’Oreal says it provides ample warning of risks on product packaging and the category represents known hazards.
The European Chemicals Agency is working to develop a centralized, expedited authorization process to increase the availability of disinfectants to consumers and healthcare professionals fighting the novel coronavirus. Meanwhile, the ECHA encourages companies to work with national authorities on single-market applications for derogations under the Biocidal Products Regulation to speed up production.