Supplement Sector Settlements Frame FTC Guidance On Direct Sellers' Compensation Claims
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Guidance notes settlements Herbalife and Vemma Nutrition made in 2016 as examples of its enforcement policies. FTC prohibition against misleading claims extends to requiring direct sellers to base claims of distributors' compensation on sales to consumers, not on measures such recruiting more distributors.
You may also be interested in...
FTC warned 10 US direct sellers about false claims for health and wellness products that prey on consumer fears over COVID-19. The agency says it will continue to monitor the market for unfounded health claims as well as direct sellers' statements about distributors' potential earnings.
Firm says "we refuse to be bullied into a settlement" and FTC conflates legal MLMs with pyramid schemes by alleging every MLM paying incentives "for recruitment of participants” is a pyramid scheme. Separate firm supplying ingredient for brain health supplement agreed to settlement of FTC false ad complaint.
Advocare "is admitting that it operated as a pyramid and they are agreeing to no longer operate in multi-level marketing," says FTC Consumer Protection direct Andrew Smith. Firm is marketing sports, weight-loss and wellness products on a single-tier model with distributors' compensation based on selling directly to end-users.