Vitamin C Pricing In Supreme Court, Vitamin D QHC Petition Fails: Health And Wellness Industry News
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Supreme Court will hear an appeal of a circuit court's reversal of a ruling that two vitamin C importers violated US antitrust laws by conspiring to fix prices; Bayer request for vitamin D QHC for multiple sclerosis rejected; Inno-Vita warned on cleansing drug claims; and 'Prevention' clear in ABC-AHP-NCNPR program name.
You may also be interested in...
Supreme Court Vitamin C Price-Fixing Decision Could Juice Litigation Against Foreign Businesses Broadly
US businesses in any industry could use the Supreme Court's ruling that federal courts have leeway in whether to recognize a foreign country's laws as applicable in a firm's defense against unfair business practices and similar civil complaints, say attorneys tracking class-action litigation vitamin C marketers Animal Science Products and Ranis Co. filed against multiple Chinese firms supplying the ingredient.
Cosmetic And Personal Care Trademark Review: 16 April
Personal care and cosmetic product trademark filings compiled from the Official Gazette of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Class 3.
Health And Wellness Weekly Trademarks Review: 16 April
Trademarks are registered and published for opposition with the US Patent and Trademark Office and are published weekly in the agency's Official Gazette.