CIR’s Ginkgo Biloba Review Illustrates Growing Botanical Challenges
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel issued a tentative insufficient data report for Ginkgo biloba-derived ingredients at its March 5-6 meeting. The panel’s struggle to map available ingredient information and toxicity data to specific uses in the cosmetics sector signals botanical review challenges that are likely to become only more frequent.
You may also be interested in...
CIR’s Expert Panel reached tentative safe conclusions for a number of naturally derived ingredients at its December meeting, while identifying data deficiencies for others. In his post-meeting report, Executive Director Bart Heldreth highlights recent commentaries in scientific journals defying the notion that natural is necessarily safe and lauding CIR as the preeminent ingredient safety authority.
CIR Expert Panel’s April Meeting: 82 Brown Algae Ingredients Reviewed; Preservative Developments; More
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel is taking its first look at brown algae-derived ingredients, with 32 passing muster at the panel’s April 8-9 meeting in Washington. Salicylic acid and fatty acids were among ingredients that received final safe verdicts, while four ingredient groups drew insufficient data announcements. Finally, parabens got tabled and MCI/MI was reopened for updates.
EU’s SCCS Reissues Guidance On Cosmetic Ingredient Testing With Updated Non-Animal Method Perspectives
The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety’s guidance offers perspective on new approach methodologies that can be used to substantiate cosmetic ingredient safety, as well as areas where alternative strategies continue to be insufficient. The document also includes updated criteria for multi-constituent natural ingredients at a time of increasing industry use.