Cosmetic Talc Under Scrutiny As Liability Buzzards Circle
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Plaintiff’s attorneys are tracking reports of asbestos-contaminated cosmetics at specialty retail stores, signaling a possible new wave of talc-related litigation to come. The issue also has the attention of NGOs, legislators and FDA.
You may also be interested in...
FDA’s Cosmetics Manufacturing Survey Under Way; J&J, Colgate Jointly Defending Talc In California; News In Brief
FDA moves ahead with its plan to survey the cosmetics industry on current manufacturing practices, with 900 companies selected for invitations to participate. More cosmetics news in brief.
J&J To Appeal $37M Mesothelioma Verdict, A First In Talc Trials
The mesothelioma liability case marks the first in New Jersey, the first involving a male plaintiff and the first to result in a plaintiff verdict. Punitive damages, potentially on top of the $37m in compensatory damages, have yet to be decided in the matter linking J&J’s talc to asbestos dangers.
‘Asbestos-Free’ A Relative Term? SAI Testing Expert On Cosmetic Talc Challenges
Transmission electron microscopy is likely the safest bet, among other imaging technologies, for companies looking to verify their cosmetic talc as asbestos-free. However, there’s no regulatory-mandated method for cosmetics purposes, which may explain conflicting results being reported by different labs.