J&J Hopes To Continue Appellate Streak Following Whopping $4.69bn Talc Verdict
This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
Counsel for 22 women who blame J&J talcum powders for their ovarian cancer took a new approach in this latest case in St. Louis Circuit Court, arguing that asbestos in the firm’s talc is the culprit, rather than talc itself. J&J is confident in its ability to overturn the verdict, which it characterized as biased and unfounded.
You may also be interested in...
J&J’s Talc Subsidiary Not ‘Financially Distressed’ Enough For Bankruptcy – Third Circuit
The J&J company holding the firm’s liabilities relating to talc litigation, which declared bankruptcy in 2021 shortly after its formation, had its Chapter 11 petition denied by the Third Circuit on 30 January. Attorneys weigh in on the implications for J&J and wider industry.
J&J's CEO Gorsky Steps Aside With Duato Named His Successor
J&J's CEO Alex Gorsky is stepping down after almost 10 years in the role and will be replaced by vice chairman of the executive committee Joaquin Duato.
J&J Appeal Of $2bn Talcum Powder Judgment Denied By US Supreme Court
The Supreme Court said on 1 June that it would not review a $2bn verdict in Missouri for 22 women who alleged links between ovarian cancer and asbestos-tainted talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder. J&J believes the US' top court passed on an "extraordinary opportunity" that "leaves unresolved significant legal questions that state and federal courts will continue to face."