HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Adore Settles With Nationwide Class Over Apple Stem Cell Anti-Aging Claims

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

The estimated $700,000 settlement puts to rest allegations that the luxury skin-care firm deceived consumers with claims about its PhytoCellTec ingredient’s ability to slow the aging process. G.M. Collin, another PhytoCellTec Malus Domestica user, also appears to have reached a deal with plaintiffs in litigation challenging its anti-aging claims.

You may also be interested in...



‘Astonishing Results’ Or ‘Outrageous’ Claims? Peter Thomas Roth Fighting Bicoastal Class Actions

Plaintiffs against the prestige, “clinical” skin-care company are targeting anti-aging claims on its Rose Stem Cell Bio-Repair line and statements about hyaluronic acid’s ultra-moisturizing capabilities, used to market its Water Drench range. PTR faces false advertising class actions in California and New York federal courts, and the former case appears to be headed for trial.

Class Action Blight: The Sour Side Of Apple Stem Cell Anti-Aging Boom

Plant stem cell actives such as Mibelle Biochemistry's PhytoCellTec Malus Domestica were marquee ingredients for skin-care brands in the flourishing US anti-aging market years back. But what once was fruitful has turned rotten with regulatory crackdowns in recent years and class actions that continue to weigh on product manufacturers.

FDA Warnings Slow, But Anti-Aging Claims Remain Class Action Targets

The online universe is abuzz with complaints about 2016, with some ready to dub the year “worst ever.” It certainly was a rough one for anti-aging skin-care marketers, and while FDA’s warning letter activity has declined of late, consumer lawsuits continue to file challenging companies’ clock-reversing promises.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS121789

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel