Consumer Reports Lathers On More Criticism Of Sunscreen SPF Claims
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet & The Rose Sheet
The annual bad marks for sunscreen brands SPF claims from Consumer Reports could be due to CR's nonconformity with FDA-prescribed test guidelines or could signal testing failures or other compliance problems in the industry. In any event, companies retest sunscreen formulas to validate their claims.
You may also be interested in...
Bayer shares results from a consulting firm's assessment of its operations, procedures and testing at the root of Coppertone SPF claims and other labeling aspects. The firm could get in front of a conversation that tends to arise this time of year regarding sunscreen safety, effectiveness and truthfulness in marketing.
Class action complaints alleging misleading "natural" claims for food products have been stayed pending completion of FDA's look at whether it should formally define the term for use in food, but there is no parallel FDA consideration of how the term is used for oral care products and topicals.
CDER has published guidances, required by the 2014 Sunscreen Innovation Act, on FDA’s process for advisory committees to consider firms’ sunscreen ingredient proposals and on withdrawing pending proposals being considered by the agency.