Pollen Counts At Claritin-D Study Sites Undermine 30-Minute Onset Claim
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
The National Advertising Review Board decision shows that firms appealing recommendations by the National Advertising Division sometimes will receive different opinions from the appellate board of appointed experts, which considered appeals by both Bayer and Sanofi's Chattem from a NAD review.
You may also be interested in...
Bayer, Chattem Sneeze At NAD Decision On Claritin And Nasacort Comparison
NAD’s review of Bayer’s Claritin and Claritin-D ads upsets Bayer and challenger Chattem as both appeal the decision to the National Advertising Review Board. Bayer argues it supports the claim nothing “works faster” than Claritin-D, while Chattem says Bayer does not support claiming Claritin-D “starts to work on allergies in 30 minutes.”
Fenty Cleanser Performance Claims Supported, But Influencer Videos Need Disclaimers – NAD
A National Advertising Division review of claims by LVMH-owned Fenty Skin determined makeup- and dirt-removal representations were substantiated by a study and subject questionnaire, but demo videos from paid endorsers must include disclosures about material connections in accordance with FTC guidelines.
MoCRA Stakeholders Reminded Registration Enforcement Begins 1 July: ‘Do Not Delay!’
The Independent Beauty Association urged stakeholders at its Cosmetic Convergence Symposium to take action to ensure they are meeting requirements of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act come 1 July, when FDA’s enforcement of the facility and product registration deadline begins. Presenters offered tips from companies that have already completed the process.