‘Distressing’ Substantiation Trends Tighten FTC Supplement Claim Enforcement
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily
FTC tightens requirements for claims substantiation due to fraud in studies and peer reviews, but its changes are not “monumental,” says Division of Advertising Practice official Richard Cleland. FTC likely will ask more supplement or nutritional product firms to conduct RCTs to support marketing claims, he adds.
You may also be interested in...
On behalf of the FTC, DoJ alleges Bayer violated a 2007 settlement to substantiate supplement claims and asks a court to require the firm to provide two RCTs for dietary supplement claims for Phillips’ Colon Health. Trade groups rally behind the firm, arguing the requirement is unfair and illegal.
The Personal Care Products Council is engaging on state legislation for extended producer responsibility programs, which impose the cost of recycling plastic materials on manufacturers. Emerging bills to prohibit use of the ‘chasing arrows’ recycling symbol on consumer packaging also have the trade group’s attention.
The Personal Care Products Council is pivoting to focus on passing cosmetics modernization legislation after mid-term congressional elections, while still hopeful the language could go through as part of FDA user-fee reauthorization. Karin Ross, executive VP, government affairs at PCPC, discussed the situation at the trade group’s Leadership Summit in Washington.