“Piggyback” Lawsuits Spur NAD To Clarify Purpose Of Investigations
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Class-action lawsuits filed following National Advertising Division decisions raise concerns among firms participating in NAD’s self-regulatory process. The advertising industry’s voluntary self-regulation program clarifies that its findings do not indicate any laws have been violated.
You may also be interested in...
ICCS President Hill On Growing Regulatory Confidence In Alternative Testing Methodologies
In the year since its establishment, the International Collaboration on Cosmetics Safety has worked to engage with regulators as they build frameworks for assessing cosmetic safety without animal tests. ICCS president and CEO Erin Hill discusses current challenges and what lies ahead.
Hawaii Contemplates Measures To Increase Access To Sunscreens Following Sunscreen Bans
Hawaii looks to “ease the burden” of finding reef-safe sunscreens by distributing it to sunseekers at beaches. The proposed legislation comes roughly three years after the Aloha State began prohibiting sale of oxybenzone- or octinoxate-containing sunscreen products due to concerns about potential harm to coral.