Trade Groups Make AER Legislation Wish List; Preemption Is Top Priority
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Federal legislation requiring mandatory adverse event reporting for dietary supplements is both "likely" and "good" but must include preemption of state laws, trade groups asserted during a "State of the Industry" seminar Nov. 11 at SupplySide West in Las Vegas
You may also be interested in...
History Says Industry Needs Post-AER Bill Response Plan – Ullman
The dietary supplement industry needs to have a "mechanism in place" to respond to actions industry opponents are likely to take following the passage of an AER bill, attorney Marc Ullman suggested at the SupplySide East trade show and conference in Secaucus, N.J. May 3
Ephedra Litigation Could Threaten AER Preemption Provision – CRN’s Mister
A court order overturning FDA's ban of ephedra could impact industry's ability to get federal preemption into a mandatory AER bill, Council for Responsible Nutrition President Steve Mister stated at the SupplySide East trade show and conference in Secaucus, N.J. May 3
Adverse Events Reporting Bill Approaching Consensus, Slated For Spring
A bill requiring mandatory adverse event reporting for dietary supplements and OTC drugs will likely be introduced this spring, according to congressional staffers