HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

“Complete Response” Reg Proposes Deficiency Letter For Withdrawn NDAs

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The definition of an efficacy supplement, which covers Rx-to-OTC switch applications, would be written into regulation for the first time under a new proposed rule issued by FDA

You may also be interested in...



FDA Rejects “Not Approvable” Letters, Clarifies Efficacy Supplement

FDA says industry concerns about the implied finality of "not approvable" letters led it to change how it responds to drug applications

Topical Antimicrobial Proposed Rule Slated For March in “Unified Agenda”

A proposed rule on consumer topical antimicrobial products is scheduled for March 2006 release, according to HHS' semi-annual "unified agenda" published in the Federal Register Oct. 31

CHPA “approvable”letter comments

FDA "should clearly define specific deficiencies" in an application in a complete response letter, the Consumer Healthcare Products Association says in Oct. 18 comments on the agency's proposed rule to discontinue use of "approvable" and "not approvable" letters. Defining deficiencies "would avoid presentation of new issues at a later date after a complete response letter has been issued, and minimize the potential for cycles of complete response letters," CHPA states. The association "supports" FDA's proposal to use complete response letters once the review cycle is complete but an application is not ready for approval. The proposed reg was published in July (1"The Tan Sheet" July 26, 2004, p. 11)...

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS128089

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel