HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Claritin Litigation Rehearing Denial Could Affect New Drug Patents

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

A Washington, D.C. federal appeals court ruling not to rehear Schering-Plough's adverse desloratadine patent infringement decision en banc could hold serious implications for future new drugs and biologics, two dissenting judges argue

You may also be interested in...

Andrx loratadine approval

FDA approves Abbreviated New Drug Application for 10 mg loratadine orally disintegrating tablets, Andrx Corporation announces Nov. 4. The tablets are bioequivalent to Schering-Plough's Claritin RediTabs. Perrigo already markets Andrx's generic versions of Claritin D24 and Claritin RediTabs. Andrx is one of at least three companies facing suits filed by Schering-Plough arguing that the firms violated certain patent claims for Clarinex (desloratadine). A Washington, D.C. federal appeals court recently upheld a D.C. appeals court decision ruling that manufacturers of generic Claritin were not infringing on those claims (1"The Tan Sheet" Nov. 3, 2003, p. 4)...

Generic Claritin Does Not Infringe Schering Patent - Appeals Court

The Aug. 1 decision by a Washington D.C. federal appeals court finding certain loratadine patent claims invalid "does not preclude patent protection for metabolites of known drugs," the judges write

Desloratadine Patent Claims No Bar To Generic Claritin, Judge Says

Schering-Plough will not be able to rely on patent claims covering desloratadine to keep generic versions of its Claritin antihistamine off the OTC market before 2004 if a federal judge's ruling is upheld on appeal





Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts