P&G
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear Amway's appeal of New Orleans federal appeals court opinion reinstating P&G's Lanham Act claim against the direct seller for product disparagement. High court's Oct. 1 denial of Amway's petition for certiorari also clears way for P&G's racketeering claim to proceed based on Amway's alleged spreading of rumor that P&G is linked to Satanism (1"The Tan Sheet" Feb. 26, In Brief)
You may also be interested in...
P&G
Claims that Amway disparaged Crest toothpaste by alleging it scratches teeth reinstated by New Orleans federal appeals court Feb. 14. Court says Houston federal judge erred in dismissing P&G's Lanham Act claim for product disparagement after initially finding sufficient evidence for claim to go to jury. Appeals court also reinstates P&G's racketeering claims based on Amway's spreading of rumor that consumer products giant is linked to Satanism. But appellate judges say P&G has no standing to bring Lanham Act claim based on Amway's alleged misrepresentations to its distributors and affirm dismissal of racketeering claim based on Amway's alleged pyramid scheme
Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010
Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC
In Brief
Combe sells most of its OTC brands