HBW Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Vitacost.com Discount Site Provides St. John's Wort Evaluations

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Vitacost.com is attempting to distinguish itself from other discount e-commerce sites by providing consumers with independent lab comparisons of dietary supplements. The first results posted are for several St. John's wort products.

You may also be interested in...


Natrol 5-Hydroxytryptophan and Nature's Way Standardized Green Tea Extract are the top-ranking products in the e-tailer's review of 13 weight loss supplements sold on the site. Products were ranked based on a comparison of label claims to actual content, expected effectiveness, safety and price. Vitacost.com notes it did not evaluate weight loss supplements containing ephedra because it does not sell the products due to safety concerns. The company previously evaluated St. John's wort supplements (1"The Tan Sheet" March 27, p. 9)

USP Supplement Potency Lower Limit Of 90% Retained

The lower potency limit dietary supplements are required to meet for the duration of their shelf life will remain at 90% of the labeled amount, the U.S. Pharmacopeia Subcommittee on Non Prescription Drugs and Nutritional Supplements voted Dec. 8 in Rockville, Md.

St. John's wort HLPC test method endorsed by USP in upcoming publication.

ST. JOHN'S WORT HPLC TEST METHOD ENDORSED BY USP over older methods used by the dietary supplement industry. The U.S. Pharmacopeia will publish its recommendation to use high performance liquid chromatography to test the potency of St. John's wort products in its next bimonthly Pharmacopeial Forum and will accept public comment on the recommendation. USP prefers HPLC to earlier UV methods including the DAC-1986 and DAC-1991 tests because it is a more discriminating procedure; HPLC allows quantitation of several marker substances such as hypericin, pseudohypericin and hyperforin while DAC-86 and DAC-91 are unable to separate out key ingredients from product excipients. The USP standards monograph on St. John's wort is due out in November.





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts