Neon Eye Makeup Not Intended For Eyes? Internet Reacts To Seeming Labeling-Marketing Contradictions
Executive Summary
Recent discussion in the media about the rise of neon eyeshadow palettes, seemingly without any of the necessary FDA-approved colorants to make them possible, has given rise to safety and regulatory compliance questions. Naturally, some consumers are outraged, while others seem reluctant to raise a stink to the detriment of makeup options.
You may also be interested in...
ColourPop Suit Challenging Unapproved Colorants In Eye Makeup Goes To Ninth Circuit
“The Court can’t make a decision the FDA itself did not make,” wrote US district judge Trina Thompson in her 7 September order dismissing plaintiff Kacey Wilson’s second amended complaint against ColourPop. At issue is the company’s use of color additives in eye makeup products that the US FDA has not approved for eye-area use, but also has not determined are likely to cause injuries, according to the court.
Huda Beauty Flouts US Law With Neon Obsession, Ahem, ‘Multiuse Pigments’ – Class Action
Huda Beauty clearly intends for its Neon Obsession color palettes to be used as eyeshadow, despite a “hidden disclaimer” contraindicating the products for eye-area use, according to the plaintiff in a proposed class action filed in California’s Central District.
Summer’s Eve Removes Three Colorants From Feminine Washes, A ‘Huge Win’ For Women’s Voices
Women’s Voices for the Earth says Prestige Brands has “quietly reformulated” Summer’s Eve products to eliminate three colorants that should not be in feminine washes, based on FDA regulations and the realities of consumer practices and women’s anatomy. Now the NGO is considering next steps.